|
Their deceptiveness does not lie in their pretending to be something they are not, but is total. The artist�s works present themselves as transparent and easy on the eye, but they are double-faced and can�t be trusted. They pose as abstract pieces, seemingly avoiding the problematic nature of figurative art�s elusive relationship with reality. In reality, however, they are fragments cut from reality, blown-up to such sizes that they become larger than life�too real to see and understand rather than not real enough.
|
|
CORNWALL 2011, 52 x 42 cm
|
|
KILLDARE 2011,52 x 42 cm
|
|
|
RIBBONS 2008, 140 x 110cm
|
The multiplicity of Annerel�s illusionism is also reflected in his working method. The artist carefully constructs his works: he copies his motifs with paint, paper, plastic or other materials, which he applies in various layers, each of them covered with a thin film of transparent resin. It makes work slow and cautious, and calls to mind the technique of glazing in traditional oil painting: the application of a number of thin, oily layers of colour on a canvas or a panel, which results in an almost perfect illusionism. Annerel�s layers of glaze, however, do the exact opposite: they are not concerned with illusionism, but with actuality. The depth they create is not illusory, but real and (almost) tangible: we sense the actual depth of the painting, as our vision is blocked by some of the layers and penetrates through others.
|
|
Yet the impression of the traditional academic fini, created by the shiny, smoothly polished top layer, strips Annerel�s works of their tactility and thus negates their depth. Once more, we find ourselves, or rather imagine ourselves, looking at a perfect illusion�an invisible window that opens to another, perfectly re-created reality
|
|
COLUMBA 2011, 106 x 86 cm
|
|