re-title.com
17 February 2011
Photography, Film & Video 

DAVID KORDANSKY GALLERY, Los Angeles
VILMA GOLD, London
CATHERINE FORSTER, Chicago
CURATOR'S OFFICE, Washington DC
GALERIE CHANTAL CROUSEL, Paris
 

 
DAVID KORDANSKY GALLERY, Los Angeles
 
 
William E. Jones, Installation view, David Kordansky Gallery, Los Angeles
 
 
William E. Jones
 
February 12, 2011 - March 26, 2011
 
David Kordansky Gallery is pleased to announce an exhibition of new work by William E. Jones. The exhibition will open on February 12 and run through March 26. An opening reception will be held on Saturday, February 12 from 6:00 to 9:00pm. William E. Jones is an artist, filmmaker, photographer and writer known for using appropriation, documentary and historical research to call attention to the inextricable relationships between images and power. In recent years his focus has shifted away from the production of films made to be screened in cinemas, and towards gallery-based works of extreme and concentrated visual impact. The exhibition will consist of three new movies, as well as two new print-based works, that investigate the roles of film and photography during moments of cultural upheaval.
 
To create the movies, Jones applies formal and organizational strategies to existing photographs and film footage, seeking to reveal the hidden, and even suppressed, historical narratives latent in their content. Since Jones works on the frames individually in Photoshop and then sequences them as animations, each frame retains an incredibly high level of photographic detail, and the finished movies occupy an unstable position between film and video.
 
In Mathew Brady's Studio Jones makes use of 100 portraits taken by the seminal American photographer in his Washington, D.C. studio after the Civil War. These images represent men prominent in the political establishment of the time, but Jones pays particular attention to the studio props with which their subjects are posed; 60 of the photographs feature a Greek-style patterned fabric, and 40 feature a vase with a floral relief. The movie consists of three loops projected next to each other. The sequence on the left zooms in and out of the fabric, the sequence on the right zooms in and out of the vase, and the projection in the center zooms slowly into the subject's face and ends at the eye closer to the camera. The work draws parallels between a transitional period in the country's past and the current political climate, in which divisions loom larger than shared interests.
 
Division is also a prominent theme in Berlin Flash Frames, which uses archival footage Jones found in the National Archives under the label "Berlin 1961." The footage was originally shot as a propaganda film by the U.S. Information Agency, and depicts scenes of life along the Berlin Wall, oscillating between obviously staged (i.e. 'fictional') vignettes with actors and documentary reportage. Jones calls attention to moments when the production is at its least guarded. By exposing the mechanisms of the film, the work also questions the larger narratives used to disseminate information about military occupations and the aftermath of war.
 
Spatial Disorientation utilizes film footage shot from the cockpit of a U.S. Air Force plane performing practice maneuvers in 1969, at the height of the Vietnam War, and is perhaps the most visually complex of the movies Jones has made to date. The looped image of a cloudy sky spins vertiginously as the plane spirals through the air. However, Jones worked and altered digital scans of each individual frame according to a rigorous mathematical system, creating a series of variations based on color and motion blurs applied to the image. During transitional moments, there are intense stroboscopic effects that challenge the viewer's ability to look at the work. By interacting with the material in this way, Jones brings out the psychedelic potential of military footage, forging an unlikely connection between cultural forces that are at direct odds with one another.
 
The two print-based pieces on view explore documentation of the Paris Commune's brief seizure of power in 1871. In Postcards of Versailles, a series of three postcard-sized prints, Jones superimposes images of assassinated Communards in their coffins over tourist images of Versailles. The work takes on the visual quality of a reliquary, creating an unsettling conflation of two kinds of photographic records: commercial postcards and images of death circulated by the French government as warnings to potential revolutionaries that insurrection would be met with severe force.
 
1871, a four-panel work, incorporates photographs of the Vendôme Column before, during, and after its destruction by the Commune. In an art historical context, these images also function as indirect documentation of a key moment in the life of Gustave Courbet, who was imprisoned after the French government took back power because he had suggested that the Column be moved across the Seine. In keeping with this history, the final panel of Jones' work includes Nadar's famous portrait of Courbet juxtaposed with a photograph of the restored Column; the artist seems to be looking despairingly at the ever-resilient symbol of imperialist power.
 
In 2011 William E. Jones will be the subject of a retrospective at the Austrian Film Museum, Vienna. His work has been featured in solo programs and exhibitions at the Museum of Modern Art, New York; Anthology Film Archives, New York; ar/ge kunst Gallery Museum, Bolzano, Italy; Wexner Center for the Arts, Columbus, Ohio; and Tate Modern, London, among others. Recent and upcoming group exhibitions include The Spectacular of Vernacular, curated by Darsie Alexander, Walker Art Center, Minneapolis; The Artist's Museum, MOCA at the Geffen Contemporary, Los Angeles; More American Photographs, curated by Jens Hoffmann, CCA Wattis Institute for Contemporary Arts, San Francisco; Serious Games: War – Media – Art, curated by Antje Ehmann and Harun Farocki, Mathildenhöhe, Darmstadt, Germany; Nachleben, curated by Fionn Meade and Lucy Raven, Goethe Institut Wyoming Building, New York; The Collectors, curated by Michael Elmgreen and Ingar Dragset, Nordic Pavilion, 53rd Venice Biennale; Beg, Borrow and Steal, Rubell Family Collection, Miami; and the 2008 Biennial Exhibition at the Whitney Museum of American Art, New York.
 
 
Image:
William E. Jones
Installation view
February 12, 2011 - March 26, 2011
David Kordansky Gallery, Los Angeles, CA
Photography: Fredrik Nilsen
Courtesy of David Kordansky Gallery, Los Angeles, CA
 
 
DAVID KORDANSKY GALLERY
3143 S. LA CIENEGA BLVD, UNIT A
Los Angeles, CA 90016
T 1 323-222-1482
 
 
 
 

 
VILMA GOLD, London
 
 
Charles Atlas, stills from Joints 4tet Ensemble, 1971 - 2010
 
 
CHARLES ATLAS
( / + \ )
 
25 FEBRUARY - 10 APRIL 2011
OPENING THURSDAY 24 FEBRUARY 6.30 - 8.30pm
 
Vilma Gold are delighted to present a solo exhibition of works by Charles Atlas, comprising an installation of new projected video works and an ambitious multi-channel video work Joints 4tet Ensemble.
 
In his new video works, encounted by the viewer immeditately upon entering the exhibition, Atlas meditates on his career now spanning over forty years. The videos take as their point of departure an imagined future viewpoint from which Altas' past work - and by extension his past self - are regarded and vice-versa. In his new work Altas seeks to explore how points of perspective (both imagined and real) may influence present ideas; he considers how past and future poles may be inter-related, or how they are activated continuously to inhabit one another affectively in the present.
 
In the second room of the exhibition Atlas will present Joints 4tet Ensemble (1971-2010), an installation of Super-8 colour films of the dancer Merce Cunningham shot by Atlas in 1971. One afternoon, after rehearsal in Irvine, California, Merce Cunningham and Charles Atlas went out of the back door of the dance studio to a raised concrete dock and started to film. As Cunningham articulated his joints in a minimal dance Atlas filmed in a variety of ways with his new Super-8 camera, shooting close-ups of Cunningham’s wrist, elbow, ankle, and knee. The films capture Cunningham’s unique style of movement. Atlas experimented with different frame rates and levels of blur, but mainly focused on following Cunningham’s moving joints as if carefully observing a strange animal. Atlas cannot entirely recall all the circumstances surrounding the filming, only that it was purely experimental. The art ists made nine short films in total, most of which were extended continuous hand-held shots.
 
For the installation Joints 4tet Ensemble, Altas brings the resulting films together for the first time, editing the material into four channels of synchronized video and showing them across a choreographed arrangement of ten different sized monitors; some placed on mono-stands, some on rolling carts, and others grouped in pairs. With this configuration of monitors Atlas harks back to ideas first used in 1978 in the creation of Fractions; a video/dance collaboration he made with Cunningham. Each monitor is orchestrated to broadcast the observation of an autonomous trail within the overall choreography of the group, reflecting Atlas’ ongoing interest in tracking the simple movement of dancers in and around a studio. The visual elements of Joints 4tet Ensemble are accompanied by four channels of collaged sound. These are reworkings of ambient sound recordings made by John Cage in the 1980s whilst on his travels to cities around the world with his long-term partner Merce Cuningham. As the sound plays out across the monitors, projection lamps cast multiple and shifting shadows over the surrounding walls of the installation.
 
Charles Atlas (born in Missouri, 1949) lives and works in New York. In 2006 Tate Modern, London presented the first UK survey of work by Atlas. He has has screenings at: Baryshnikov Arts Center, New York (2011); Turbine Hall, Tate Modern, London (2010); MOMA, New York (2010) ; and Walker Arts Center, Minneapolis ( 2010). In 2010 he was also included in group shows at: Hayward Gallery, London; ICA Philadephia (touring to Contemporary Arts Museum, Houston); MIT/LIST Visual Art Center, Cambridge, Massachusetts; Kunstverein Nürnberg, Nürnberg; De Hallen Haarlem, The Netherlands; PS1, New York (touring to Garage Centre for Contemporary Culture, Moscow) and KAde Kunsthal in Amersfoort. In April 2011 Atlas will have a major collaborative exhibition at the South London Gallery, London.
 
 
Image:
Charles Atlas
Stills from Joints 4tet Ensemble, 1971 - 2010
Super 8mm film transferred to video, 4 channel video, colour
four channel sound using material recorded by John Cage
10 Sony monitors, metal stands, programmed projection lights and flash players
13 Mins 12 Secs (Loop)
Courtesy of Vilma Gold, London
 
 
VILMA GOLD
6 Minerva Street
London E2 9EH
T +44 (0) 20 7729 9888
 
 
 
 

 
CATHERINE FORSTER, Chicago
 
 
Catherine Forster, Now for the Painter: Late Autumn Afternoon Drift, 4-channel video, 2009
 
 
Catherine Forster
Relish The Drift
 
March 1 - March 31, 2011
Lecture 4-5PM, Reception 5-6PM, Tuesday March 1
 
Relish The Drift, a solo exhibition of works by Catherine Forster, includes an ambitious  compilation of 13 videos, paintings and inkjet prints. Relish the Drift captures the marriage of light and movement and water’s uncanny ability to convey allegory; in the process Forster has discovered a unique companion to video.
 
In Golden Oldies Forster deploys the movement of water to create visual scores for Billboard hits from the 60s-80s. Filmed underwater, Drift is a poem about isolation, loss and acceptance. The illusion of light, texture and movement in Now for the Painter is an ode to R.J.W. Turner’s last seascapes. Swallow explores the sheer power of water, while H2O celebrates the union of water and light.
 
Catherine Forster’s interests lay in the little inconsistencies and contradictions of every day life, banal moments that add up to something else. Her work induces viewers to slow down and spend time with each piece.  Forster lives near water and solves her creative challenges while kayaking or walking close to shore. “While walking or kayaking I note the changes in color, texture, and viscosity of the surface through the seasons, crystal clear in spring after the ice melts, heavy and somewhat murky during hot summer days, dark and full of unexpected contrasts in the autumn light, frozen in winter, clear beneath the ice. It is not surprising that water would eventually find its way into my work.”
 
Catherine Forster is a filmmaker, artist, and curator based in the Chicago area. She received an M.F.A from the School of the Art Institute of Chicago. Upcoming solo exhibitions include the Peggy Notebaert Nature Museum Chicago and Merwin Gallery Illinois Wesleyan University. Her artwork has been shown at the City of Louisville Colorado Sculpture Garden, Carnegie Art Museum, South Bend Regional Art Museum, Flint Institute of Art, Orange County Contemporary Art Center, Exit Art (NY), Hyde Park Art Center Chicago, and the Contemporary Art Centre in Vilnius, Lithuania, to name a few. Films by Forster have been screened at the Sao Paul International Short Film Festival, Echotrope New Media Arts Festival (Omaha), Simultan Media Arts Festival (Romania), Echo Park Film Center (LA), Magmart Film Festival Casoria International Contemporary Art Museum (Italy), Directors Lounge (Berlin), and San Diego International Women Film Festival. Forster is also the founder and director of LiveBox a non-profit nomadic gallery focused on media art and performance.
 
 
Image:
Catherine Forster
Now for the Painter: Late Autumn Afternoon Drift
4-channel video, 2009
Courtesy of The Rymer Gallery, Nashville, TN
 
Merwin & Wakeley Galleries
Ames School of Art
Illinois Wesleyan University
Bloomington
IL 61702-2900
USA
 
 
 
 

 
CURATOR'S OFFICE, Washington DC
 
 
Nicholas & Sheila Pye, The Departure, 2010
 
 
Nicholas & Sheila Pye
AMEND
 
February 19 - April 2, 2011
Opening Reception: Saturday, February 19, 6 - 8 pm
 
Curator's Office is pleased to present its third exhibition of works by internationally acclaimed Canadian collaborative team Nicholas & Sheila Pye. Entitled Amend, the exhibition features 6 photographs from their latest body of work together. This exhibition coincides with the presentation of their dramatic three-channel video installation, The Coronation, at The Phillips Collection, Washington, DC.
 
In Amend, the Pyes once again perform in front of the camera to create a series of tableaux that reflect the transition from their union to their separation from one another. The artists explore the powerful ties that unite people on different levels, even during separation and departure. In these six works the artists delve into powerful subjects such as the death of a relationship, vulnerability, denial, acceptance and release with an ambiguous undercurrent of hopeful transformation and resurrection. The Pyes allude to their own relationship in a creative way, yet their work shares universal themes about a union that is no longer tenable between people.
 
One trenchant aspect of this body of work is that the Pyes give the impression that they are faking their deaths to take mortality, blame, and repentance into account. The title, Amend, refers to the modification of their relationship in search of something better and raises questions about what it means to get angry, to refuse, to love and lose, to accept that change and be forever altered.
 
The Pyes relentlessly blur the borders between their lives and their art as they tackle the highly charged yet poetic issues that arise from their own relationship. But theirs is not a self-absorbed biographical fascination. Rather, the relationship depicted in their work becomes emblematic of all things that can go wrong in a mutually dependent and suffocating relationship. Their work joins a lineage of other artist couples -- such as Marina Abramovic & Ulay and Gilbert & George -- who use their relationship to explore the nuanced tribulations of coupledom.
 
The Pyes' artistic output spans photography, film, performance, video, and installation while acknowledging the profound influences of surrealism in film, narrative conventions in painting, 19th and early 20th century portraiture, and conceptual approaches to subject matter. Given this well-versed theoretical blend, they avoid prosaic performance art documentation preferring to transform their photographs and films into works that cleverly reconfigure art historic antecedents.
 
The Pyes have exhibited their work at museums such as The Hirshhorn Museum & Sculpture Garden, Washington, DC; The Phillips Collection, Washington, DC; Museum of Contemporary Art, San Diego, CA; The Museo Nacional Centro de Arte Reina Sofía, Madrid, Spain; Galerie Nationale du Jeu de Paume, Paris, France; Incheon Women's Biennial, Incheon, Korea; Kunsthallen Brænderigården, Denmark; Meet Factory, Prague, Czech Republic; San Francisco Arts Commission Gallery, San Francisco, CA: Museum of Contemporary Canadian Art, Toronto, Canada; The Power Plant, Toronto, Canada; The Glenbow Museum, Calgary, Canada; and the Art Gallery of Greater Victoria, British Columbia, Canada.
 
Their work has been screened in numerous international film festivals such as the Toronto International Film Festival, Canada; the Locarno International Film Festival, Switzerland; and Les Rencontres Internationales in Paris, Berlin, and Madrid. Their work has also been exhibited internationally at numerous galleries including Curator's Office, Washington, DC; Begoña Malone Gallery, Madrid; Art Mur, Montreal; Artcore / Fabrice Marcolini, Toronto; Alexia Goethe Gallery, London; Galerie Adler, Frankfurt; Caprice Horn Gallery, Berlin; Nettie Horn Gallery, London; RARE Gallery, New York; Angell Gallery, Toronto; and Kasia Kay Art Projects, Chicago.
 
 
Image:
Nicholas & Sheila Pye
The Departure, 2010
archival digital print mounted onto aluminum
48 x 48 in, edition of 5
Courtesy of Curator's Office, Washington, DC
 
 
Curator's Office
1515 14th Street NW
Suite 201
Washington, DC
20005, USA
 
 
 
 

 
GALERIE CHANTAL CROUSEL, Paris
 
 
Hassan Khan, Muslimgauze R.I.P., 2010
 
 
Hassan Khan
Lust
 
29 January - 5 March 2011
 
Objects of Collective Consciousness
By Brian Kuan Wood
 
Don’t trust the lights. Rather, look into to the darkness for what you need. Hassan Khan’s video installation Jewel (2010, 35 mm film transferred to HD) opens with a cloud of lights flickering to a soundtrack—produced by Khan himself—of hypnotic drones. But one soon discovers that these lights are not stars or a coastal hamlet at night, but a swarm of hideous fang-faced anglerfish— the elegant sparkling being nothing other than the light emitted from the strange growth on their faces: a lure for prey. As a ferocious beat sets in, the image of the anglerfish freezes and shape-shifts, “fossilizing” as a pattern of lights. The camera pulls out, and the fish pattern is shown to be punched into a revolving object—a totemic sort of disco ball surrogate—around which two men, one younger and one older, each perform a strange dance of desperate flailing, drow ning, falling, grabbing, and whipping gestures. It is a spare scene of some kind of sinister, yet perfectly viable Arab subculture collectively reveling in a response to total collapse—one in which dancing, limbs flailing in the air, becomes a powerful and resilient performance of futile gestures. Moving with the ambivalence of marionettes commanded by forces that are not theirs, the work draws to a close with the scene slowly receding into darkness in a single continuous tracking shot. What is it that haunts these men and compels them to act, to move?
 
At Galerie Chantal Crousel from 29 January–5 March, Khan presents “Lust”, a multilayered constellation of recent works that can be seen as focal points in his practice over the past three years. While the included works are highly enigmatic in nature and communicate on a number of registers, it is simultaneously important to consider them in light of a sophisticated line of thinking that has taken place over the course of the artist’s 15-year career. Key to this thinking has been a dynamic centered on private consciousness and public address—a way of dealing with the movements of ideological forces and social constructions of value as they pass from the crowd in the street into the psyche and back. In this sense we can then address his oeuvre as a means of confronting the spectral nature of these movements throughout a flowing cultural subconscious of a “publi c mind.”
 
Key to this is Khan’s particular approach to the way ideological thinking and spectrality function in relation to physical material. In an attempt to revisit the quasi-religious and messianic thinking latent in Marx’s writing on commodity fetishism, Jacques Derrida has used the term “hauntology” to describe a spectral ontology functioning within Marx’s materialist critique of the commodity. As a subtle play on “ontology,” the term allows room for a phantasmatic form of being to precede the material commodity as the ghostly desire for such a commodity to emerge (or be produced) in the first place. Derrida goes on to propose Marx’s very materialist critique to be an exorcism of this already existing auratic, ghostly presence that surrounds an object, expelling the ghosts that would possess a piece of material such as wood to think of itself as not only a chair, but e ven a diamond, or a Ferrari. But, following from the “hauntological,” for Khan these apparitions are of the utmost importance, as they are themselves another form of material. It is from here that Khan’s work as an artist finds its materiality: as compressions of social desires.
 
If we then suppose that these collective desires, as a form of hidden consensus, also carry ideological content, then the obvious question becomes: What other errant, spectral products are floating around, and how can we perceive them? From this perspective, we have already entered another state of being—one that requires a shift in the understanding of how objects behave, and how they reflect and accommodate collective desires (or a lack thereof ). With Banque Bannister (2010), the centerpiece of the exhibition at Chantal Crousel, one finds a brass handrail trying to find its purpose—leaning on something that is missing and leading to something that is not there. Hovering in space, it assumes the shape of ordinary piping or a “stairway to heaven”—leaping forward to find stairs to rest itself on. In a twisting of an orthodox Duchampian move, similar to that of Banque Bannis ter, Khan’s Evidence of Evidence II (2010) is an enormous (3.5 x 3 meter) scan of a discarded flower painting, printed on vinyl, that reverses the premises of a Fountain (1917) or Bottle Rack (1914). Like Duchamp’s readymades, it assumes another character when it enters the exhibition, but, contra Duchamp, it does not gain auratic value or become formally abstracted—in fact, on a formal level, Evidence of Evidence II is barely aware of the exhibition format at all, and it arrives without suspicion or preconceived notions. As its title suggests, the aura does not lie in the context (the exhibition format, with its loaded implications), but came before it, in the flower painting’s domestic origin in the home. As a zoomed-in, scientific extraction of collective meaning latent in a staple bourgeois decorative motif, the artist has described Evidence of Evidence II as “a set of values and socio-economic facts be ing transformed or translated into aesthetic facts.” This is how Khan positions the objects furnishing the generally-accepted and the already- existing to make them speak about both what they are and what they are about. It is not a Duchampian sleight of hand that recontextualizes the object to introduce potential other readings, but the opposite: a fundamentally subtractive process of obliterating the potential for an already-auratic, already-inflated flower painting to say anything about the person who owns it. Blasting it back down to literal material, it becomes unrecognizable even to itself.
 
Here it is also important to mention the darkness that surrounds these works, for why should it be necessary to obliterate meanings, to subtract possibilities, to reduce agency in such a way—especially when so much of the language used in art contexts is geared towards the production of meaning, the multiplicity of possibilities, the celebration of heterogeneity, and even the potential for art to make positive contributions to the world? With this we can simply look to another common understanding, that “political” content in art is necessarily affirmative for initiating the possibility of political agency. But how can the political be automatically aligned with agency, with “hope,” and potentiality? What about authoritarian regimes, tyranny, the poverty of available options, endemic corruption, botched elections, and all-around collapse— a saturation of a politics that does n ot include democracy and activism, but point instead to defeat and withdrawal? Are these states of being not equally political, if not radically more so? What is the shape of a political dead-end in which there is no formal expression, no representation— where a political address utterly hollowed of potential might still speak? (And those looking to situate Khan’s work in an Egyptian context may begin by inferring the current political climate and regime in Egypt into the above—it would not be far off.)
 
 
Image:
Hassan Khan
Muslimgauze R.I.P., 2010
Full HD video transferred to Blu-Ray, sound
8 min 07, Edition of  6
Photo credit: Hassan Khan
Courtesy of Galerie Chantal Crousel, Paris
 
 
GALERIE CHANTAL CROUSEL
10 rue Charlot
75003 Paris
France
T +33 1 42 77 38 87
 
 
 
 
 
 

 
re-title.com - Independent directories of emerging & professional contemporary art
 
Coming Next
 
February 23-14 Sculpture & Installation
March 2-3 Painting & Drawing
March 9-10 Mixed / Multi Media
March 16-17 Photography, Film & Video
 
 
Search for contemporary artists and galleries from all over the World
- go to re-title.com
- use the top search button to search for artists or exhibitions
- narrow search by location and genre
 
For more information about our services click here or contact us  
 
 

 
 re-title.com 
BM Box 5163
London
WC1N 3XX
United Kingdom
+44 (0) 870 922 0438