|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
GALERIE
CONRADS, Düsseldorf |

Yang Jiechang4
September 2010 to 16 October 2010 Born in 1956 in
Guangdong Province, Yang Jiechang currently
lives and works in Paris. After graduating from the Guangzhou
Fine Arts Academy in 1982, he took up a rigorous study of the
Tao with the Taoist master, Huangtao. Simultaneously he became
active in the contemporary art scene in China which was then
undergoing rapid development. Yang Jiechang gained
international recognition through the exhibition of his large
monochrome ink paintings, severe in their abstraction and
spirituality, in "Les magiciens de la terre" in the Centre
Pompidou in Paris in 1989. Since then he regularly
participates in western and eastern biennales of contemporary
art. Nevertheless, his oeuvre comprises a variety of media:
painting, video, installation, and
interventions. Excerpts from Hou Hanru´s text
>Towards a World of Poets<* about Yang Jiechang
: Yang Jiechang is probably the most
unpredictable and chaotic artist in his generation. For the
last thirty years, he has constructed an immense body of work.
It covers a large span of media and languages from ink-wash
painting, Chinese calligraphy, drawing, photography,
installation, performance, sound, music, multimedia to simply
everyday actions while the formats vary from huge and
oversized to tiny and quasi immaterial. However, he has never
tightened himself to any fixed and established style, norm and
issue. Instead, he always reacts to the given context and
momentum of each events in which he participates and produces
new concepts and forms to put forward his systematically
critical, provocative and even subversive thoughts and
expressions. He simply comes up with a new surprise every
time. (...) In the last century, "reforming" Chinese
traditional painting (ink painting) has been an unsolved and
somehow unsolvable obsession for the Chinese art world. It has
been widely considered as a part of the national mission of
cultural modernisation. This issue became even more crucial
and urgent in the Chinese avant-garde movement of the 1980s.
Trained as an ink painter and calligrapher, Yang Jiechang
started his artistic career in involving himself with the
debate. After gaining perfect skills of traditional painting
and calligraphy and a deep knowledge of Chinese art history
and theory, he sought to escape from the double confinement of
the academic rules and the norms of the dominant Socialist
Realism still prevailing in the art world, in order to obtain
the real freedom and joy that art can offer. He spent a
considerable amount of time in a Taoist temple in Luofu
Mountain in Guangdong province and learned Taoism with a
master. Instead of any fixed form of "traditional expression",
he has learned that the real spirit of the tradition is to be
found in the actions of the everyday which is in infinite
change. Unlike many of his contemporary avant-gardists who
claimed the death of the Chinese ink painting, Yang Jiechang
simply continues to merge himself in the field and explores
exhaustively all possibilities that the tradition can offer
and invent totally new ways to utilise it. Ink painting and
calligraphy have hence remained the red string that conducts
all his artistic adventures for the last three decades. And,
it will continue to be so. In his numerous work, he
incorporates all genres that ink painting contains and push
them to the most radical degree of their possibilities.
(...) In addition, all these explorations of the
expressions with ink are often expanded to take over the
entire space of the exhibition as if their expansions could be
totally beyond any boundary. Frequently, he incorporates any
imaginable kind of media to bring this effort of expansion
infinitely further: performance, installation, photography,
video and even rock and roll! Fundamentally, Yang
Jiechang's work is seeking for a complete merge of art and
life. It takes place, at first, in the real in a literal sense
of the term: art is a process of living experience that can
only be sensed through the body itself. (...) In many of
his recent works, he introduces human skulls and body parts.
Rather than showing the terror of death, he manages to turn
them into suspiciously playful and ironic forms that provoke
astonishment and laughter. For him, putting the body in an
"abnormal" state and catch the extraordinary experience is
certainly the best way to understand the very reality of his
existence. This can be understood in a particular perspective
related to his own life experience, which is, to different
extends, shared by a great number of his contemporaries. As
one of the first generation of Chinese contemporary artists
settled abroad since the late 1980s, the question of cultural
identity has been a central concern in his life and work. Like
many of his colleagues, Yang Jiechang has never been entirely
relying on his Chinese background. Instead, he adopts a
completely open attitude towards all kinds of cultural
influences that he encounters in his new living conditions
consisting of a multi-national family, global city life and
transcontinental travels. It's in the very process of
confronting, embracing and exchanging with other cultures and
different living realities that he has been constantly trying
to reinvent his own identity. * >Yang Jiechang -
No-Shadow Kick<, Beijing/Hong Kong/ Bangkok/ Shanghai
2008 Image: Yang
Jiechanginstallation view at CONRADS
2010 Galerie ConradsLindenstr.
167 40233 Dusseldorf Germany T +49
211.3230720 Galerie
ConradsRead
On... Galerie Conrads
Düsseldorf
|
DILSTON
GROVE, London |
Matt's Gallery presents TAPS: Improvisations with
Paul Burwell at Dilston Grove, London.
17-19 September 2010: Friday 2-10pm: continuous
film screening 2pm-7pm, performances from 7-10pm Saturday
2-10pm: continuous film screening and performances from
2-10pm. Closing view with final event 6-8pm
Paul Burwell was infamous
for his exuberant fusions of fine-art installation, percussion
and explosive performance. He was a staunch advocate of, and
passionate participant in, all forms of experimental art.
TAPS: Improvisations with Paul Burwell, realised by
Anne Bean, Robin Klassnik and Richard Wilson embodies his
prolific practice.
Over the course of three days TAPS will
combine film, installation and performance, portraying layers
of interpretation from more than 80 invited collaborators, in
response to Burwell's poem Adventures in the House of
Memory. The poem arose from improvisations by Anne Bean
and Paul Burwell in preparation for William Burroughs
Final Academy at Ritzy, London in 1982, where
improvised words were written on huge sheets of flash paper
which were ignited as they were sung. The poem was the
last recorded Burwell work two months before he died in 2007.
The body of collaborators, including Steven Berkoff, Evan
Parker, Rose English and Paul McCarthy, have responded to the
poem by each creating a short film or audio work as a new
collaboration for, about or 'with' Burwell.
Fragments of the collaborators' film or
audio works, now make a collective totem in a two screen, one
hour composite film interpreted and edited by Anne Bean and
Chris Bishop. This resulting work resonates with the poem's
innate episodic chronicles, as slivers interleaf together and
runs continuously throughout each day. The film is shown as
part of a screen installation constructed by Richard Wilson.
By adding its own sounds and actions, this structure becomes a
part player in the final act of the last evening, during a
performance by Ansuman Biswas.
Live performances form another layer of
exploration, echoing the sense of inter-connectivity created
by the installation. Performances by Shaun Caton, William
Cobbing, Kaffe Matthews, Juneau Projects (Friday 6-10pm),
Melissa Castagnetto, Steve Noble & Oren Marshall and Yol
(Saturday 6-10pm) and Ryuzo Fukuhara, performing during Sunday
afternoon, improvise within the context of the poem, film,
installation and space at Dilston Grove. Each performer
encompasses a practice that reflects the context and ethos in
which Burwell worked. The performances will take place at
various times during the event.
Each collaborator's original film or audio
work will be available in full online through Vimeo from
September, a link for which can be accessed through the Matt's
Gallery website http://www.mattsgallery.org/
A publication with an essay by David Toop
and drawings by Paul McCarthy, published by Matt's Gallery
will be available free to visitors throughout the event.
TAPS is supported by a Legacy: Thinker in
Residence Award to Anne Bean.
Legacy is a collaboration between the
Live Art Development Agency and Tate Research, financially
assisted by Arts Council England and the Live Art Development
Agency. Legacy acknowledges the outstanding bodies of work of
two artists who have influenced the development of the Live
Art field by supporting them to think about the legacies of
performance in art historical contexts and examine the
processes and challenges of archiving live work. The Legacy
recipients are Anne Bean and Tim Etchells. Live Art Development
Agency
Anne Bean is an Artsadmin
artist.
Image: Film still, TAPS: Improvisations
with Paul Burwell, 2010 Original films - Paul McCarthy,
David Ellis & Lee Merrill Courtesy the artists and
Matt's Gallery, London
DILSTON GROVE Southwark
Park London SE16 2UA T +44 (0)20 7237 1230
Dilston Grove is at the Southwest
corner of Southwark Park Tube: Canada Water on the Jubilee
& Overground Lines Buses: 1,47, 188, 199, 225, 381,
C10, P12
|
MOTHER'S
TANKSTATION, Dublin |

URI ARAN DOCTOR DOG
SANDWICH
15 September - 30 October 2010
Doctor Dog Sandwich
- Taxonomy, truth, order, linguistics, pedagogy, modern
thinking and the letter 'P' in the events of Uri
Aran
"But let us begin at the beginning.
We will begin with the following sentence, by which something
undoubtedly started to dawn on modern thinking, that is,
something began to surprise itself in it, something with which
we have not yet finished: "But philosophy is not meant to be a
narration of happenings but a cognition of what is true in
them, and further, on the basis of this cognition, to
comprehend that which, in the narrative, appears as a mere
happening [or pure event -Trans]" 1
What makes Uri Aran's art a
meaning[full] event is not only that it happens, but that it
surprises (diverting itself from its own "happening", not
allowing it to be an event - but surprising the being in it,
allowing it to be only by way of surprise). Thereby Aran's
events; which adopt the forms of videos, drawings and
sculptures are simply extraordinary because they have
the unstoppable capacity to not only surprise the viewer, but
themselves and perhaps even the person that made them (or more
precisely, makes them) as they are, by definition,
unfinishable projects and therefore resist classification as
static objects. They appear not to possess the will to resolve
or define themselves in any conventional expected way, perhaps
because they are essentially experiments with the infinity of
possibility, exploring the potential to become. And
anything that is in a state of continual becoming can have no
past tense. It is often said that we have lost meaning,
that we lack it, and as a result are in need of it and waiting
for it. This idea, however, forgets that the very propagation
of discourse is meaningful. Regretting the absence of meaning
itself has meaning. Meaning always means, but this does not,
per force, mean that it necessarily has to mean
any[particular]thing.
Given that Aran's work is triggered by
the premise that understanding meaning begins with naming,
Hegel's sentence is indicative of Aran's general philosophical
approach, in that it can be read in more than one way.
According to a first reading, Aran's art signifies that the
task at hand is to conceive that of which the event is only
the phenomenon. But, to be more precise, there is first of all
the truth that is contained in what happens, and in light of
this 'truth', the conception of its production or
effectuation, which appears from the outside as an event, pure
and simple, exactly because it is not conceived. On this
account, the event-ness of the event (its appearance, its
coming to pass, its taking place) is only the external,
apparent and inconsistent side of the effective presentation
of truth. The advent of the truth as real, which is contained
in the concept, disqualifies the event as a simple, narrative
representation. Therefore anything that Aran proposes as
a narrative representation of reality, or truth, is possible
(meaningful): 'A' is for Banana.
Similarly, by deconstructing his videos
into their constituent elements, by dividing and separating
their defining constructional symptoms; cinematography,
story-boarding/script, sound, space, pace, editing and action,
he disrupts the expected narrative structure, and in turn, the
way in which we anticipate meaning and/or narrative, plot,
story; truth, to develop, or indeed mean
anything specific, or at all 2. C is for desire. This is
epitomised in The Donut Gang, in which, Aran employs
the formal elements that approximate easily digested models of
filmmaking. It sports casual attitudes of a well crafted, but
seemingly lightweight, causeless, nonsensical, open-ended
narrative, in which the actress serves as a self-aware cliché
of an 'actress'. Furthermore, extra doubt is contributed by a
voice-over that represents a confused idea of knowledge and
the artist who himself serves as a manipulative participant in
a game that conspiratorially renders meaninglessness
meaningful. Indicatively, throughout Aran's practice the means
of production links directly to causal effectuation.
What do I know to be true? I know that
Aran's video Harry (2007), breaks my heart, yet
simultaneously, I intellectually comprehend that this is not
'true', although a truth, that I could be being emotionally
manipulated into something that becomes. The same is true of
Untitled, 2006, in which the artist sits in an
otherwise empty room, crying, comforting or being comforted by
his dog, and as both persist in emotionally tearing me apart,
I have to think very hard to figure this out before the daily
encounter with the exhibition pushes me over an edge.
Harry is structured on what
appears to be a night time newscast, filmed in front of a
construction site. However, the prosaic nature of the action
is emotionally amplified by the drama of the lighting, the
slowed motion and the visual impact of the workers struggling
against extreme cold. The newscaster is muted and replaced by
a disembodied narrator reading a love letter, expressed with
the exaggerated cadence of a Victorian romantic. He describes
his feelings for a lover in clichéd terms that rely heavily on
animal metaphors. The purple and gilded prose, the tortured
similes and the disruption of repetition are almost contained
and even transmuted to magical evocation by the skill of the
voice-over actor. Repetition of the script gradually reorients
the focus from established literary comparisons; "he is as
gentle as a bear, as hungry as a wolf, as wise as an owl" etc,
to the power relationship between the camera, the subject and
the viewer - leaving us again with doubt in respect to how
truth is 'manufactured', rather than that it simply exists.
Unable to piece together the fractured mood we seek clues
through the intertextuality of visuals, language, and shared
cultural experience, only to be confronted with
open-endedness; a litany of questions, that are all
meaningful, but have particular meaning.
Untitled, employs fewer
elements; the artist, the dog, the room, the tears, the
camera, the edit. But similarly an emotional confusion is
triggered by the subtle conflation of pathos and bathos.
The action and ambient sound are slowed, the contact of the
hand on fur, the way in which the dog's skin wrinkles and
retracts with the rhythmic stroking of the artist's hand (a
visual pun?) 3, leaves an unforgettably emotive imprint of the
animal's unconditional love. At such a simple yet powerful
outcome (this is generally a useful word in
understanding Aran's purpose) all other attendant issues or
constructs fall aside, we simply cannot resist emotional
empathy, nothing else matters. Good Dog.
The wilful misapplication of taxonomy
is yet another tool in the skill-set of the challenging,
philosophically astute art of Uri Aran. According to the laws
of infotainment/ pedagogical structures; 'A is for apple', but
in the hands of Aran 'A' can stand for anything. In his own
understated words; 'all letters are good, but some are better
than others' 4. This questioning assessment of the alphabet in
Aran's videos is of course not based upon anything as prosaic
as functionality, or even taxonomic determination (noun,
consonant, etc), but the idea of a given letter's phonetic
capacity, its potential to realise, or release emotional or
sentimental outcome. The letter 'P' has more
emotional impact, therefore greater meaning, than the letter
'H'. Particularly when enunciated slowly, repeated with a time
lag and accompanied by background audio track of Villa-Lobos.
"The letter 'P', ...the let-ter 'Pea'... ".
Doctor Dog Sandwich, is Uri
Aran's (lives and works in New York) inaugural solo exhibition
with mother's tankstation, subsequent to joining the
gallery and his first solo exhibition outside the USA.
1 Jean Luc-Nancy, The Surprise of
the Event; in Being Singular Plural,
Stanford University Press, 2000. Pg. 159. "The following
sentence" in question is taken from the second book of Hegel's
Science of Logic, in a text entitled "The Notion
[Concept] in General", which serves as an introduction to
"Subjective Logic; or the Doctrine of the Notion". 2 But as
noted above, the declamation of meaninglessness is inherently
meaningful. 3 Uri Aran is also prone to use his identical
twin brother (doppelganger) in video works, so one can never
be entirely certain whether the depiction of the artist is
actually himself or a resemblance of self. 4 The artist,
however, particularizes the point that; in 'real life' all
letters are good - that there can be no hierarchy - and
only in the videos are letters "good" or "bad", in terms of
how they function when juxtaposed with particular music,
visuals, or placement (what comes before and after), or the
cadence and timing of enunciation. Simply put, some of these
experiments work better then others, but relative failures
must be retained to know the relative
successes.
Image: Uri Aran Courtesy of
mother's tankstation, Dublin
mother's tankstation 41-43
Watling Street Ushers Island Dublin 8 Ireland T
+353 (0)1 6717654 E gallery @
motherstankstation.com
|
PRAZ-DELAVALLADE,
Paris |

VALENTIN CARRON
10 September - 30 October 2010
One should always take Valentin
Carron's work at face value. Bertrand (2010), a work
in lacquered glass cast from his own body, offers us a rather
miserable portrait of the artist: two feet, its toes showing
through worn out socks. Bertrand brings to mind earlier works
of Valentin Carron (that remain little known in France) that
played with the stereotypes of a forlorn masculinity, such as
his improbable tobacco ice cream, a gold nail clipper or
leather slippers tailored to the feet of the tallest man
alive. If one understands "Bertrand" in French as a generic
name for the neighborhood drunk or the local outcast, his sad
plight stands miles apart from the current clichés of the
over-professionalized, young, financially successful and
healthy artist.
We have to go back to the '80s to find
the last incidence of the antisocial artist as a mainstream
figure, which was then customarily represented as an
expressionistic painter, usually an alcoholic, and preferably
German. Knowing that this period also brought the advent of
his younger twin, the artist as entrepreneur-cum-Wall Street
trader, Valentin Carron's seemingly conservative image is not
so much reactionary as confrontational, and brings to mind
Magritte's purposely-rude Vache period, such as Jean-Marie, a
1948 portrait of a hen thief with a peg leg making a get away.
Coming from an artist that claims to spend his days producing
scale models of "the very things (he) abhors," it would be a
mistake not to take Valentin Carron's acrid humor seriously.
This perpetual and willful ambiguity, between statements that
are obviously meant with irony and, simultaneously, demand to
be taken sincerely, gives the work its uniquely unservile
quality.
One of the great strengths of Valentin
Carron's work is its capacity to translate these games of
moral irresolution into material and stylistic tensions which
belong to the history of sculpture: the vernacular and the
modern, the handmade and the industrial, the original and the
copy, the institutional and the avant-garde, etc. Hence
Einhorn (Unicorn, 2010), a geometric progression in four parts
inspired by Minimalism, made with a standard European
middle-class villa decorative element. Except that here, these
twisted metal bars are clearly cast rather than the product of
a blacksmith's hand, just as are the nails, the screws used to
hang a new series of untitled works on paper which waver
between atmospheric landscapes and radical, monochromatic
abstractions. Valentin Carron's work is eminently
non-dialectic, and the inherent conflicts between all the
antagonist terms that compose it remain unresolved. As such,
the chimeras he brings into the world never cease to corner
us, slightly against our will, in the uncomfortable position
of ideological arbiter.
Fabrice Stroun
Image: Valentin Carron
Exhibition view Courtesy of Praz-Delavallade,
Paris
PRAZ-DELAVALLADE 5, rue des
Haudriettes 75003 Paris France T +33 1 45 86 20
00 E info @ praz-delavallade.com
|
BISCHOFF/WEISS,
London |

Nathaniel Rackowe What the
city left behind
17 September - 30 October 2010
There's something profoundly
otherworldly about Nathaniel Rackowe's
Garden Fence Uprising - almost as if it had simply
materialised, emerging suddenly into plain sight. With its
tilted angles and rearing prow, it gives the impression of,
indeed, rising up at us; of heaving into view, dragging itself
purposefully up from unknown depths: like a submarine,
perhaps, some sleek and silent vessel; or something from the
subconscious, some collective fear made manifest; or an
embodiment of the suburban - not, that is, the suburbs as
geographical construct, but rather the sub-urban: that which
exists below the surface of a city, ignored or repressed;
which doesn't form part of a city's conscious image.
It's this obscure, submerged zone which
Rackowe's structure seems to have risen from, triumphantly,
ominously; which, for that matter, all of Rackowe's work seeks
to evoke in some way: a terrain of in-between and inadvertent
spaces, of makeshift and ad hoc constructions, of mundane and
ersatz materials. Vacant lots, forgotten alleys, shabby
lean-to's - it's spaces such as these, Rackowe's work seems to
suggest, that are equally, if not more, emblematic of the life
of a city than any glitzy array of architectural
landmarks.
Rackowe never attempts to define or
encapsulate these sub-urban spaces - the notion would be
contradictory, since they are, by their very nature, temporary
and indeterminate. Rather, what we get in his work are
glimpses and fragments: dark corners that he brings to light;
objects whose outlines shift and rotate; fleeting images
captured through drawing. The sense is of the city as
something fugitive and furtive, undergoing constant upheaval
and transformation, its subconscious forms continually
threatening to erupt and take over.
Garden Fence Uprising can be
seen in revolutionary terms, as the first wave of this revolt
- its first solid victory, perhaps. Individually, these
fencing units would appear lowly, insignificant, if even
noticed at all; bandied together, their mass production
becomes their strength, a collective demonstration of
architectural impact - as they rise up, buoyed by insurgency,
to claim their aesthetic dues. Bolted together, coated in
waterproof bitumen, made to endure - the final structure
becomes a kind of monument to itself: a symbol of liberation,
a redemption of what the city left behind.
Text by Gabriel Coxhead
Image: Nathaniel
Rackowe Garden Fence Uprising,
2010 Garden fencing, bitumen paint, fluorescent lights,
steel, cables, 5 x 3 x 3 m Courtesy of BISCHOFF/WEISS,
London
BISCHOFF/WEISS 14A Hay
Hill W1J 8NZ London United Kingdom T +44 0207 033
0309
|
GALERIA
SOLEDAD LORENZO, Madrid |

TXOMIN BADIOLA
GOODVIBES / WHAT THE SIGN
CONCEALS
7 September - 2 October 2010
The works that are currently on show in
the Soledad Lorenzo gallery under the generic
title of GOODVIBES/ : WHAT THE SIGN CONCEALS, were created as
part of a project entitled PRIMER PROFORMA 2010 BADIOLA EUBA
PREGO 30 EJERCICIOS 40 DIAS 8 HORAS AL DIA developed in MUSAC
between 30 January and 6 June 2010.
PROFORMA was created as the search for a
generic format of collaboration between three artists Euba,
Prego and myself with an institution, MUSAC, as an alternative
in response to the invitation of its director, Agustin Perez
Rubio, to carry out three individual exhibitions coinciding in
time.
This project began to define itself,
throughout 2009, in the form of weekly meetings held between
the three artists involved in the project, as well as other
more sporadic meetings with the institution in order to
develop the bases of a common project.
On 30 January 2010, each artist launched an
exhibition proposal in the MUSAC containing the conditions
necessary for its later development. Each proposal was
presented in a varying higher or lower degree of completion in
relation to its actual development in terms of finished works.
Nearly all of the works exhibited were new productions that
had been created deliberately for the exhibition space of the
MUSAC. As well as the spaces dedicated towards each of the
artists, two other spaces were dedicated to a joint collection
of works: the PROFORMA studio, an inflatable pneumatic
structure created by Sergio Prego assigned to gather all the
activity not directly accessible to the public and the
PROFORMA module, conceived as the material, documentary and
creative expression of the project developed.
On 8 February the 3 artists remained
secluded in their exhibition inside the museum alongside a
group of 15 volunteers (selected through a public call after
having presented the project in the three faculties of fine
art near Leon) with a work encounter programme consisting in
30 exercises to be completed within 40 days. This experience
in collective, individual and artistic work held within an
exhibition apparatus was targeted towards a transformation,
both of the people involved as well as the exhibitions
themselves.
Each one of us, as directors of the
project, carried out 10 exercises. The director of each, as
well as the other two directors and the remaining
participants, were involved in all the exercises in roles
determined case by case. In addition to the agents mentioned,
the presence of external agents was necessary, in order to
embody an external gaze and participate from the outside:
segments of an audience called in on an ad hoc basis, in
addition to guests who acted as witnesses and were given
specifically regulated tasks within the development of the
activity in which they actively engaged.
PROFORMA was therefore, basically a
production which worked based on a programme of 30 exercises
distributed into 2-hour modules (as 2, 4 or 6-hour exercises).
The exercises consisted in the execution of a productive act;
that is, the generation of experiences, thoughts or physical
bodies. The exercises were related to the works exhibited,
representing their potential for development and
transformation. The aim of the exercises was to involve
others, through a course of action, in what was a typically
private experience. Each exercise generated physical or
immaterial results that were gathered for consideration on a
daily basis, both in terms of its direct analysis as an
experience or its documentation and communication by an
editorial board or peer-review group, brought together by the
directors, volunteers and eventually any other external agent
invited to participate. As a result they were part of the
material expression belonging to the exhibition space entitled
the PROFORMA Module, as well as that of the web-page http://primerproforma2010.org/
The works that are now presented in the
Soledad Lorenzo gallery are closely linked to the PROFORMA
project and are an integral part of two of the exercises
carried out there: The collection formed by the
installation and the wall works under the generic title of
Goodvibes corresponds with the exercise with the same title
( http://primerproforma2010.org/ejercicio-9-goodvibes)
carried out on 18 February 2010, from the ideas related with
those of "vanitas" and "memento mori".
Four video pieces related to the
following PROFORMA exercises will be presented: Exercise nº
11. Doce consideraciones comunicadas a un pusilánime en cinco
jornadas. Exercise nº 16. Máquina L. Exercise nº 19 Sordos,
ciegos, mudos. Exercise nº 25. Doce estaciones.
Txomin Badiola 2010.
Image: TXOMIN
BADIOLA Goodvibes, 2009. Impresión
gráfica sobre metal, fundición en bronce pulido, madera,
guitarra, pie de micro, sillas, suelo con elementos gráficos,
monitor con vídeo Courtesy of Galeria Soledad Lorenzo,
Madrid
GALERÍA SOLEDAD
LORENZO Orfila 5. 28010 Madrid T +34
913 082 887 / 8 E galeria @ soledadlorenzo.com
| |
|
|
re-title.com -
Independent directories of emerging & professional
contemporary art
Coming Next
September 22-23 Mixed / Multi Media
September 29-30 Painting & Drawing October 6-7
Sculpture & Installation October 13-14 Photography,
Film & Video
Autumn / Fall schedule now
available.
Search for contemporary artists and galleries from all
over the World - go to re-title.com
- use the top search button to search for artists or
exhibitions - narrow search by location and
genre
|
|
BM Box 5163 London WC1N 3XX United
Kingdom
+44 (0) 870 922
0438 |
| |