re-title.com
  16 September 2010

Sculpture & Installation  

View as webpage  Follow on Twitter

GALERIE CONRADS, Düsseldorf
DILSTON GROVE, London
MOTHER'S TANKSTATION, Dublin
PRAZ-DELAVALLADE, Paris
BISCHOFF/WEISS, London
GALERIA SOLEDAD LORENZO, Madrid
 

GALERIE CONRADS, Düsseldorf


Yang Jiechang, installation view at CONRADS 2010

 
Yang Jiechang

4 September 2010 to 16 October 2010

Born in 1956 in Guangdong Province, Yang Jiechang currently lives and works in Paris. After graduating from the Guangzhou Fine Arts Academy in 1982, he took up a rigorous study of the Tao with the Taoist master, Huangtao. Simultaneously he became active in the contemporary art scene in China which was then undergoing rapid development. Yang Jiechang gained international recognition through the exhibition of his large monochrome ink paintings, severe in their abstraction and spirituality, in "Les magiciens de la terre" in the Centre Pompidou in Paris in 1989. Since then he regularly participates in western and eastern biennales of contemporary art. Nevertheless, his oeuvre comprises a variety of media: painting, video, installation, and interventions.

Excerpts from Hou Hanru´s text >Towards a World of Poets<* about Yang Jiechang :

Yang Jiechang is probably the most unpredictable and chaotic artist in his generation. For the last thirty years, he has constructed an immense body of work. It covers a large span of media and languages from ink-wash painting, Chinese calligraphy, drawing, photography, installation, performance, sound, music, multimedia to simply everyday actions while the formats vary from huge and oversized to tiny and quasi immaterial. However, he has never tightened himself to any fixed and established style, norm and issue. Instead, he always reacts to the given context and momentum of each events in which he participates and produces new concepts and forms to put forward his systematically critical, provocative and even subversive thoughts and expressions. He simply comes up with a new surprise every time.

(...) In the last century, "reforming" Chinese traditional painting (ink painting) has been an unsolved and somehow unsolvable obsession for the Chinese art world. It has been widely considered as a part of the national mission of cultural modernisation. This issue became even more crucial and urgent in the Chinese avant-garde movement of the 1980s. Trained as an ink painter and calligrapher, Yang Jiechang started his artistic career in involving himself with the debate. After gaining perfect skills of traditional painting and calligraphy and a deep knowledge of Chinese art history and theory, he sought to escape from the double confinement of the academic rules and the norms of the dominant Socialist Realism still prevailing in the art world, in order to obtain the real freedom and joy that art can offer. He spent a considerable amount of time in a Taoist temple in Luofu Mountain in Guangdong province and learned Taoism with a master. Instead of any fixed form of "traditional expression", he has learned that the real spirit of the tradition is to be found in the actions of the everyday which is in infinite change. Unlike many of his contemporary avant-gardists who claimed the death of the Chinese ink painting, Yang Jiechang simply continues to merge himself in the field and explores exhaustively all possibilities that the tradition can offer and invent totally new ways to utilise it. Ink painting and calligraphy have hence remained the red string that conducts all his artistic adventures for the last three decades. And, it will continue to be so. In his numerous work, he incorporates all genres that ink painting contains and push them to the most radical degree of their possibilities.

(...) In addition, all these explorations of the expressions with ink are often expanded to take over the entire space of the exhibition as if their expansions could be totally beyond any boundary. Frequently, he incorporates any imaginable kind of media to bring this effort of expansion infinitely further: performance, installation, photography, video and even rock and roll!

Fundamentally, Yang Jiechang's work is seeking for a complete merge of art and life. It takes place, at first, in the real in a literal sense of the term: art is a process of living experience that can only be sensed through the body itself. (...)
In many of his recent works, he introduces human skulls and body parts. Rather than showing the terror of death, he manages to turn them into suspiciously playful and ironic forms that provoke astonishment and laughter. For him, putting the body in an "abnormal" state and catch the extraordinary experience is certainly the best way to understand the very reality of his existence. This can be understood in a particular perspective related to his own life experience, which is, to different extends, shared by a great number of his contemporaries. As one of the first generation of Chinese contemporary artists settled abroad since the late 1980s, the question of cultural identity has been a central concern in his life and work. Like many of his colleagues, Yang Jiechang has never been entirely relying on his Chinese background. Instead, he adopts a completely open attitude towards all kinds of cultural influences that he encounters in his new living conditions consisting of a multi-national family, global city life and transcontinental travels. It's in the very process of confronting, embracing and exchanging with other cultures and different living realities that he has been constantly trying to reinvent his own identity.

* >Yang Jiechang - No-Shadow Kick<, Beijing/Hong Kong/ Bangkok/ Shanghai 2008


Image:
Yang Jiechang
installation view at CONRADS 2010


Galerie Conrads
Lindenstr. 167
40233 Dusseldorf
Germany
T +49 211.3230720

Galerie Conrads

Read On... Galerie Conrads Düsseldorf



DILSTON GROVE, London
 
TAPS: Improvisations with Paul Burwell at Dilston Grove, London 
  

Matt's Gallery presents TAPS: Improvisations with Paul Burwell at Dilston Grove, London.

17-19 September 2010:
Friday 2-10pm: continuous film screening 2pm-7pm, performances from 7-10pm
Saturday 2-10pm: continuous film screening and performances from 2-10pm.
Closing view with final event 6-8pm

Paul Burwell was infamous for his exuberant fusions of fine-art installation, percussion and explosive performance. He was a staunch advocate of, and passionate participant in, all forms of experimental art. TAPS: Improvisations with Paul Burwell, realised by Anne Bean, Robin Klassnik and Richard Wilson embodies his prolific practice.

Over the course of three days TAPS will combine film, installation and performance, portraying layers of interpretation from more than 80 invited collaborators, in response to Burwell's poem Adventures in the House of Memory. The poem arose from improvisations by Anne Bean and Paul Burwell in preparation for William Burroughs Final Academy at Ritzy, London in 1982, where improvised words were written on huge sheets of flash paper which were ignited as they were sung.  The poem was the last recorded Burwell work two months before he died in 2007. The body of collaborators, including Steven Berkoff, Evan Parker, Rose English and Paul McCarthy, have responded to the poem by each creating a short film or audio work as a new collaboration for, about or 'with' Burwell.

Fragments of the collaborators' film or audio works, now make a collective totem in a two screen, one hour composite film interpreted and edited by Anne Bean and Chris Bishop. This resulting work resonates with the poem's innate episodic chronicles, as slivers interleaf together and runs continuously throughout each day. The film is shown as part of a screen installation constructed by Richard Wilson. By adding its own sounds and actions, this structure becomes a part player in the final act of the last evening, during a performance by Ansuman Biswas.

Live performances form another layer of exploration, echoing the sense of inter-connectivity created by the installation. Performances by Shaun Caton, William Cobbing, Kaffe Matthews, Juneau Projects (Friday 6-10pm), Melissa Castagnetto, Steve Noble & Oren Marshall and Yol (Saturday 6-10pm) and Ryuzo Fukuhara, performing during Sunday afternoon, improvise within the context of the poem, film, installation and space at Dilston Grove. Each performer encompasses a practice that reflects the context and ethos in which Burwell worked. The performances will take place at various times during the event.

Each collaborator's original film or audio work will be available in full online through Vimeo from September, a link for which can be accessed through the Matt's Gallery website http://www.mattsgallery.org/

A publication with an essay by David Toop and drawings by Paul McCarthy, published by Matt's Gallery will be available free to visitors throughout the event.

TAPS is supported by a Legacy: Thinker in Residence Award to Anne Bean.

Legacy is a collaboration between the Live Art Development Agency and Tate Research, financially assisted by Arts Council England and the Live Art Development Agency. Legacy acknowledges the outstanding bodies of work of two artists who have influenced the development of the Live Art field by supporting them to think about the legacies of performance in art historical contexts and examine the processes and challenges of archiving live work. The Legacy recipients are Anne Bean and Tim Etchells. Live Art Development Agency

Anne Bean is an Artsadmin artist.


Image:
Film still, TAPS: Improvisations with Paul Burwell, 2010
Original films - Paul McCarthy, David Ellis & Lee Merrill
Courtesy the artists and Matt's Gallery, London


DILSTON GROVE
Southwark Park
London SE16 2UA
T +44 (0)20 7237 1230

Dilston Grove is at the Southwest corner of Southwark Park
Tube: Canada Water on the Jubilee & Overground Lines
Buses: 1,47, 188, 199, 225, 381, C10, P12






MOTHER'S TANKSTATION, Dublin


Uri Aran, Doctor Dog Sandwich, installation view, mother's tankstation, Dublin

 
URI ARAN
DOCTOR DOG SANDWICH

15 September - 30 October 2010

Doctor Dog Sandwich  - Taxonomy, truth, order, linguistics, pedagogy, modern thinking and the letter 'P' in the events of Uri Aran

"But let us begin at the beginning. We will begin with the following sentence, by which something undoubtedly started to dawn on modern thinking, that is, something began to surprise itself in it, something with which we have not yet finished: "But philosophy is not meant to be a narration of happenings but a cognition of what is true in them, and further, on the basis of this cognition, to comprehend that which, in the narrative, appears as a mere happening [or pure event -Trans]" 1

What makes Uri Aran's art a meaning[full] event is not only that it happens, but that it surprises (diverting itself from its own "happening", not allowing it to be an event - but surprising the being in it, allowing it to be only by way of surprise). Thereby Aran's events; which adopt the forms of videos, drawings and sculptures are simply extraordinary because they have the unstoppable capacity to not only surprise the viewer, but themselves and perhaps even the person that made them (or more precisely, makes them) as they are, by definition, unfinishable projects and therefore resist classification as static objects. They appear not to possess the will to resolve or define themselves in any conventional expected way, perhaps because they are essentially experiments with the infinity of possibility, exploring the potential to become.  And anything that is in a state of continual becoming can have no past tense.  It is often said that we have lost meaning, that we lack it, and as a result are in need of it and waiting for it. This idea, however, forgets that the very propagation of discourse is meaningful. Regretting the absence of meaning itself has meaning. Meaning always means, but this does not, per force, mean that it necessarily has to mean any[particular]thing.

Given that Aran's work is triggered by the premise that understanding meaning begins with naming, Hegel's sentence is indicative of Aran's general philosophical approach, in that it can be read in more than one way. According to a first reading, Aran's art signifies that the task at hand is to conceive that of which the event is only the phenomenon. But, to be more precise, there is first of all the truth that is contained in what happens, and in light of this 'truth', the conception of its production or effectuation, which appears from the outside as an event, pure and simple, exactly because it is not conceived. On this account, the event-ness of the event (its appearance, its coming to pass, its taking place) is only the external, apparent and inconsistent side of the effective presentation of truth. The advent of the truth as real, which is contained in the concept, disqualifies the event as a simple, narrative representation.  Therefore anything that Aran proposes as a narrative representation of reality, or truth, is possible (meaningful): 'A' is for Banana.

Similarly, by deconstructing his videos into their constituent elements, by dividing and separating their defining constructional symptoms; cinematography, story-boarding/script, sound, space, pace, editing and action, he disrupts the expected narrative structure, and in turn, the way in which we anticipate meaning and/or narrative, plot, story; truth, to develop, or indeed mean anything specific, or at all 2. C is for desire. This is epitomised in The Donut Gang, in which, Aran employs the formal elements that approximate easily digested models of filmmaking. It sports casual attitudes of a well crafted, but seemingly lightweight, causeless, nonsensical, open-ended narrative, in which the actress serves as a self-aware cliché of an 'actress'. Furthermore, extra doubt is contributed by a voice-over that represents a confused idea of knowledge and the artist who himself serves as a manipulative participant in a game that conspiratorially renders meaninglessness meaningful. Indicatively, throughout Aran's practice the means of production links directly to causal effectuation.

What do I know to be true? I know that Aran's video Harry (2007), breaks my heart, yet simultaneously, I intellectually comprehend that this is not 'true', although a truth, that I could be being emotionally manipulated into something that becomes. The same is true of Untitled, 2006, in which the artist sits in an otherwise empty room, crying, comforting or being comforted by his dog, and as both persist in emotionally tearing me apart, I have to think very hard to figure this out before the daily encounter with the exhibition pushes me over an edge. 

Harry is structured on what appears to be a night time newscast, filmed in front of a construction site. However, the prosaic nature of the action is emotionally amplified by the drama of the lighting, the slowed motion and the visual impact of the workers struggling against extreme cold. The newscaster is muted and replaced by a disembodied narrator reading a love letter, expressed with the exaggerated cadence of a Victorian romantic. He describes his feelings for a lover in clichéd terms that rely heavily on animal metaphors. The purple and gilded prose, the tortured similes and the disruption of repetition are almost contained and even transmuted to magical evocation by the skill of the voice-over actor. Repetition of the script gradually reorients the focus from established literary comparisons; "he is as gentle as a bear, as hungry as a wolf, as wise as an owl" etc, to the power relationship between the camera, the subject and the viewer - leaving us again with doubt in respect to how truth is 'manufactured', rather than that it simply exists. Unable to piece together the fractured mood we seek clues through the intertextuality of visuals, language, and shared cultural experience, only to be confronted with open-endedness; a litany of questions, that are all meaningful, but have particular meaning.

Untitled, employs fewer elements; the artist, the dog, the room, the tears, the camera, the edit. But similarly an emotional confusion is triggered by the subtle conflation of pathos and bathos.  The action and ambient sound are slowed, the contact of the hand on fur, the way in which the dog's skin wrinkles and retracts with the rhythmic stroking of the artist's hand (a visual pun?) 3, leaves an unforgettably emotive imprint of the animal's unconditional love. At such a simple yet powerful outcome (this is generally a useful word in understanding Aran's purpose) all other attendant issues or constructs fall aside, we simply cannot resist emotional empathy, nothing else matters. Good Dog.

The wilful misapplication of taxonomy is yet another tool in the skill-set of the challenging, philosophically astute art of Uri Aran. According to the laws of infotainment/ pedagogical structures; 'A is for apple', but in the hands of Aran 'A' can stand for anything. In his own understated words; 'all letters are good, but some are better than others' 4. This questioning assessment of the alphabet in Aran's videos is of course not based upon anything as prosaic as functionality, or even taxonomic determination (noun, consonant, etc), but the idea of a given letter's phonetic capacity, its potential to realise, or release emotional or sentimental outcome.  The letter 'P' has more emotional impact, therefore greater meaning, than the letter 'H'. Particularly when enunciated slowly, repeated with a time lag and accompanied by background audio track of Villa-Lobos. "The letter 'P', ...the let-ter 'Pea'... ".

Doctor Dog Sandwich, is Uri Aran's (lives and works in New York) inaugural solo exhibition with mother's tankstation, subsequent to joining the gallery and his first solo exhibition outside the USA.

1 Jean Luc-Nancy, The Surprise of the Event; in Being Singular Plural, Stanford University Press, 2000. Pg. 159. "The following sentence" in question is taken from the second book of Hegel's Science of Logic, in a text entitled "The Notion [Concept] in General", which serves as an introduction to "Subjective Logic; or the Doctrine of the Notion".
2 But as noted above, the declamation of meaninglessness is inherently meaningful.
3 Uri Aran is also prone to use his identical twin brother (doppelganger) in video works, so one can never be entirely certain whether the depiction of the artist is actually himself or a resemblance of self.
4 The artist, however, particularizes the point that; in 'real life' all letters are good - that there can be no hierarchy  - and only in the videos are letters "good" or "bad", in terms of how they function when juxtaposed with particular music, visuals, or placement (what comes before and after), or the cadence and timing of enunciation. Simply put, some of these experiments work better then others, but relative failures must be retained to know the relative successes.


Image:
Uri Aran
Courtesy of mother's tankstation, Dublin


mother's tankstation
41-43 Watling Street
Ushers Island
Dublin 8
Ireland
T +353 (0)1 6717654
E gallery @ motherstankstation.com




PRAZ-DELAVALLADE, Paris


Valentin Carron, Exhibition view, Praz-Delavallade, Paris

 
VALENTIN CARRON

10 September - 30 October 2010

One should always take Valentin Carron's work at face value. Bertrand (2010), a work in lacquered glass cast from his own body, offers us a rather miserable portrait of the artist: two feet, its toes showing through worn out socks. Bertrand brings to mind earlier works of Valentin Carron (that remain little known in France) that played with the stereotypes of a forlorn masculinity, such as his improbable tobacco ice cream, a gold nail clipper or leather slippers tailored to the feet of the tallest man alive. If one understands "Bertrand" in French as a generic name for the neighborhood drunk or the local outcast, his sad plight stands miles apart from the current clichés of the over-professionalized, young, financially successful and healthy artist.

We have to go back to the '80s to find the last incidence of the antisocial artist as a mainstream figure, which was then customarily represented as an expressionistic painter, usually an alcoholic, and preferably German. Knowing that this period also brought the advent of his younger twin, the artist as entrepreneur-cum-Wall Street trader, Valentin Carron's seemingly conservative image is not so much reactionary as confrontational, and brings to mind Magritte's purposely-rude Vache period, such as Jean-Marie, a 1948 portrait of a hen thief with a peg leg making a get away. Coming from an artist that claims to spend his days producing scale models of "the very things (he) abhors," it would be a mistake not to take Valentin Carron's acrid humor seriously. This perpetual and willful ambiguity, between statements that are obviously meant with irony and, simultaneously, demand to be taken sincerely, gives the work its uniquely unservile quality.

One of the great strengths of Valentin Carron's work is its capacity to translate these games of moral irresolution into material and stylistic tensions which belong to the history of sculpture: the vernacular and the modern, the handmade and the industrial, the original and the copy, the institutional and the avant-garde, etc. Hence Einhorn (Unicorn, 2010), a geometric progression in four parts inspired by Minimalism, made with a standard European middle-class villa decorative element. Except that here, these twisted metal bars are clearly cast rather than the product of a blacksmith's hand, just as are the nails, the screws used to hang a new series of untitled works on paper which waver between atmospheric landscapes and radical, monochromatic abstractions. Valentin Carron's work is eminently non-dialectic, and the inherent conflicts between all the antagonist terms that compose it remain unresolved. As such, the chimeras he brings into the world never cease to corner us, slightly against our will, in the uncomfortable position of ideological arbiter.

Fabrice Stroun


Image:
Valentin Carron
Exhibition view
Courtesy of Praz-Delavallade, Paris


PRAZ-DELAVALLADE
5, rue des Haudriettes
75003 Paris
France
T +33 1 45 86 20 00
E info @ praz-delavallade.com



BISCHOFF/WEISS, London


Nathaniel Rackowe, Garden Fence Uprising, 2010

 
Nathaniel Rackowe
What the city left behind

17 September - 30 October 2010

There's something profoundly otherworldly about Nathaniel Rackowe's Garden Fence Uprising - almost as if it had simply materialised, emerging suddenly into plain sight. With its tilted angles and rearing prow, it gives the impression of, indeed, rising up at us; of heaving into view, dragging itself purposefully up from unknown depths: like a submarine, perhaps, some sleek and silent vessel; or something from the subconscious, some collective fear made manifest; or an embodiment of the suburban - not, that is, the suburbs as geographical construct, but rather the sub-urban: that which exists below the surface of a city, ignored or repressed; which doesn't form part of a city's conscious image.

It's this obscure, submerged zone which Rackowe's structure seems to have risen from, triumphantly, ominously; which, for that matter, all of Rackowe's work seeks to evoke in some way: a terrain of in-between and inadvertent spaces, of makeshift and ad hoc constructions, of mundane and ersatz materials. Vacant lots, forgotten alleys, shabby lean-to's - it's spaces such as these, Rackowe's work seems to suggest, that are equally, if not more, emblematic of the life of a city than any glitzy array of architectural landmarks.

Rackowe never attempts to define or encapsulate these sub-urban spaces - the notion would be contradictory, since they are, by their very nature, temporary and indeterminate. Rather, what we get in his work are glimpses and fragments: dark corners that he brings to light; objects whose outlines shift and rotate; fleeting images captured through drawing. The sense is of the city as something fugitive and furtive, undergoing constant upheaval and transformation, its subconscious forms continually threatening to erupt and take over.

Garden Fence Uprising can be seen in revolutionary terms, as the first wave of this revolt - its first solid victory, perhaps. Individually, these fencing units would appear lowly, insignificant, if even noticed at all; bandied together, their mass production becomes their strength, a collective demonstration of architectural impact - as they rise up, buoyed by insurgency, to claim their aesthetic dues. Bolted together, coated in waterproof bitumen, made to endure - the final structure becomes a kind of monument to itself: a symbol of liberation, a redemption of what the city left behind.

Text by Gabriel Coxhead

Image:
Nathaniel Rackowe
Garden Fence Uprising, 2010
Garden fencing, bitumen paint, fluorescent lights, steel, cables, 5 x 3 x 3 m
Courtesy of BISCHOFF/WEISS, London


BISCHOFF/WEISS
14A Hay Hill
W1J 8NZ London
United Kingdom
T +44 0207 033 0309



GALERIA SOLEDAD LORENZO, Madrid


TXOMIN BADIOLA, Goodvibes, 2009

 
TXOMIN BADIOLA
GOODVIBES / WHAT THE SIGN CONCEALS

7 September - 2 October 2010

The works that are currently on show in the Soledad Lorenzo gallery under the generic title of GOODVIBES/ : WHAT THE SIGN CONCEALS, were created as part of a project entitled PRIMER PROFORMA 2010 BADIOLA EUBA PREGO 30 EJERCICIOS 40 DIAS 8 HORAS AL DIA developed in MUSAC between 30 January and 6 June 2010.

PROFORMA was created as the search for a generic format of collaboration between three artists Euba, Prego and myself with an institution, MUSAC, as an alternative in response to the invitation of its director, Agustin Perez Rubio, to carry out three individual exhibitions coinciding in time.

This project began to define itself, throughout 2009, in the form of weekly meetings held between the three artists involved in the project, as well as other more sporadic meetings with the institution in order to develop the bases of a common project.

On 30 January 2010, each artist launched an exhibition proposal in the MUSAC containing the conditions necessary for its later development. Each proposal was presented in a varying higher or lower degree of completion in relation to its actual development in terms of finished works. Nearly all of the works exhibited were new productions that had been created deliberately for the exhibition space of the MUSAC. As well as the spaces dedicated towards each of the artists, two other spaces were dedicated to a joint collection of works: the PROFORMA studio, an inflatable pneumatic structure created by Sergio Prego assigned to gather all the activity not directly accessible to the public and the PROFORMA module, conceived as the material, documentary and creative expression of the project developed.

On 8 February the 3 artists remained secluded in their exhibition inside the museum alongside a group of 15 volunteers (selected through a public call after having presented the project in the three faculties of fine art near Leon) with a work encounter programme consisting in 30 exercises to be completed within 40 days. This experience in collective, individual and artistic work held within an exhibition apparatus was targeted towards a transformation, both of the people involved as well as the exhibitions themselves.

Each one of us, as directors of the project, carried out 10 exercises. The director of each, as well as the other two directors and the remaining participants, were involved in all the exercises in roles determined case by case. In addition to the agents mentioned, the presence of external agents was necessary, in order to embody an external gaze and participate from the outside: segments of an audience called in on an ad hoc basis, in addition to guests who acted as witnesses and were given specifically regulated tasks within the development of the activity in which they actively engaged.

PROFORMA was therefore, basically a production which worked based on a programme of 30 exercises distributed into 2-hour modules (as 2, 4 or 6-hour exercises). The exercises consisted in the execution of a productive act; that is, the generation of experiences, thoughts or physical bodies. The exercises were related to the works exhibited, representing their potential for development and transformation. The aim of the exercises was to involve others, through a course of action, in what was a typically private experience. Each exercise generated physical or immaterial results that were gathered for consideration on a daily basis, both in terms of its direct analysis as an experience or its documentation and communication by an editorial board or peer-review group, brought together by the directors, volunteers and eventually any other external agent invited to participate. As a result they were part of the material expression belonging to the exhibition space entitled the PROFORMA Module, as well as that of the web-page http://primerproforma2010.org/

The works that are now presented in the Soledad Lorenzo gallery are closely linked to the PROFORMA project and are an integral part of two of the exercises carried out there:

The collection formed by the installation and the wall works under the generic title of Goodvibes corresponds with the exercise with the same title (http://primerproforma2010.org/ejercicio-9-goodvibes) carried out on 18 February 2010, from the ideas related with those of "vanitas" and "memento mori".
The three large wooden scaled relieves with texts incorporated were what sparked off exercise 13 entitled What the sign conceals (http://primerproforma2010.org/ejercicio-13) carried out on 24 February 2010.

Four video pieces related to the following PROFORMA exercises will be presented: Exercise nº 11. Doce consideraciones comunicadas a un pusilánime en cinco jornadas. Exercise nº 16. Máquina L. Exercise nº 19 Sordos, ciegos, mudos. Exercise nº 25. Doce estaciones.

Txomin Badiola 2010.

Image:
TXOMIN BADIOLA
Goodvibes, 2009.
Impresión gráfica sobre metal, fundición en bronce pulido, madera, guitarra, pie de micro, sillas, suelo con elementos gráficos, monitor con vídeo
Courtesy of Galeria Soledad Lorenzo, Madrid


GALERÍA SOLEDAD LORENZO
Orfila 5.
28010 Madrid 
T +34 913 082 887 / 8
E galeria @ soledadlorenzo.com



re-title.com - Independent directories of emerging & professional contemporary art

Coming Next

September 22-23 Mixed / Multi Media
September 29-30 Painting & Drawing
October 6-7 Sculpture & Installation
October 13-14 Photography, Film & Video

Autumn / Fall schedule now available.

 
Search for contemporary artists and galleries from all over the World
 
- go to re-title.com
- use the top search button to search for artists or exhibitions
- narrow search by location and genre


For more information about membership and services click here or contact us  
  
 
re-title.com

BM Box 5163
London
WC1N 3XX
United Kingdom

+44 (0) 870 922 0438

Subscribe  View as webpage  Follow on Twitter